The most significant changes are in the results interface, however: an all-new single window presentation is much easier to use for folder comparisons, is easier to manage, and (for folder comparisons) provides the ability to copy files as needed from one folder to another. New UI for Find Differences - The "Find Differences" dialog box has been modernized, and folder comparisons are faster than ever, thanks to a rewritten and newly performance-tuned comparison engine.The Clippings palette, text completion system, and the "Insert Clipping" command have been extended to support this additional flexibility. Any clipping set can be made available universally or on a per-language basis (for any desired set of languages). New Clippings system mechanics - The Clippings system (used for creating, managing, and applying frequently used "snippets" of text) is now even more powerful and flexible.Git support - BBEdit now has built-in support for Git, to make many common operations available without having to switch applications.(click the image above to see it full size in a new browser tab) Support for color schemes has been expanded, and several factory color schemes are included. Improved syntax coloring - The internal syntax coloring mechanics have been extensively reworked, allowing for a much greater selection of core color types, and now allowing language modules to add their own color types.Here's a summary of the high points, but we encourage you to read the complete change notes. It's popularity is no accident.BBEdit 11 is here! What's new in BBEdit 11? But has a TON of features, allows you chop up your manuscript into whatever sized chunks you like, then drag-and-drop arrange and rearrange, and gives you a LOT for your money. It's a bit clunky and rough around the edges. I was first introduced to it on mac-but at the time BBEdit handled all my needs-things changed on Windows. Then, for creative writing, I settled on Scrivener, which has become very popular of late. With that said, I find all three completely adequate and all having roughly the same feature set. But, at least coming from BBEdit, I found some of it's functionality to be a little obtuse. Atom, on the other hand, is much cleaner. In contrast, one of the most popular Windows options, Notepad++, is a mess. I don't like it as much as BBEdit by any means, but it's certainly the most similar to BBEdit in that it sports a lean and elegant interface. That's right, they're just using html tags but can't really be used for any actual coding.Īnyway, for coding, I settled on Kate. Made more ironic by the fact that a good portion of 'creative' focused text editors tend to be 'markup' editors these days. Coding and creative text editing was going to have to be split. The "Glossary" palette was a tremendous pivot point for this, and after a (waaaay too) long search into the nook and crannies of windows software, I finally threw up my hands and realized a compromise was going to have to be reached. This was really, really, really difficult for me as I used BBEdit for BOTH coding and creative writing as it was malleable enough to accommodate both.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |